Sentry Auto-Fix: AI Automated Bug Fixing
It is 2 AM. Your phone buzzes. Another Sentry alert. A null reference in production. You drag yourself out of bed and spend 20 minutes fixing something a machine could fix in seconds. Here is how to change that.

It is 2 AM. Your phone buzzes. Another Sentry alert. A null reference in production. You drag yourself out of bed, remote in, spend 20 minutes finding the issue, another 10 fixing it, and go back to sleep groggy and annoyed. This happens again. And again. And again.
Here is the thing: most production bugs are not hard. They are obvious. A null check that was missed. A type that was wrong. A boundary condition that was not handled. The kind of fix that takes a senior engineer 5 minutes — except at 2 AM after being woken up for the third time that week, it takes 20.
Sentry Auto-Fix solves this. It is a webhook-driven pipeline that receives error alerts and fixes them automatically. No humans required. No on-call paging. Just fixes.
Key Takeaways
- Sentry Auto-Fix connects Sentry error alerts directly to an AI coding agent that analyzes the error, generates a fix, and creates a PR — automatically.
- The pipeline uses a multi-agent architecture: Discovery Agent assesses if the issue is fixable, Planning Agent builds an execution plan, and Execution Agents generate the fix code.
- Real-world impact: Teams have fixed bugs in 30 minutes that would normally take an engineer an entire day.
- Safety first: All fixes come as PRs for human review. No automatic merges. You always have the final say.
- The Sentry Auto-Fix skill on Claw Mart gives you the complete pipeline — webhook server, agent configs, and GitHub integration — for $9.
How Automated Bug Fixing Actually Works
The flow is elegant in its simplicity:
- Sentry fires a webhook when a new error arrives.
- Your OpenClaw instance receives the webhook and passes it to the Auto-Fix pipeline.
- Discovery Agent kicks in first — it analyzes the error (stacktrace, user context, breadcrumbs) and decides: is this fixable?
- If yes, Planning Agent builds an execution plan — what files need changing, what the fix should look like.
- Execution Agents generate the fix code — along with any unit tests needed to verify it works.
- A GitHub PR is created with the diff, description, and test results.
- You review and merge — when you are ready, at your pace.
The key insight: this is not about replacing engineers. It is about eliminating the drudgery. The 2 AM pages for obvious bugs. The context switching. The accumulated fatigue from constant interruptions.
What Makes It Work
Three things make automated bug fixing actually viable:
Rich context. Sentry gives you more than a stack trace. You get user context (what the user was doing), breadcrumbs (the path they took), and traces (how the request flowed through your system). This is everything an engineer would spend minutes reconstructing. The AI gets it automatically.
Human in the loop. The pipeline never merges automatically. Every fix comes as a PR. You review, you test, you merge. The AI does the work. You make the decisions. This is not autonomous — it is assisted.
Confidence filtering. Not every error is worth fixing. The Discovery Agent filters for issues that are: high-confidence (the root cause is clear), fixable (there is a clear code change), and non-destructive (the fix will not break something else). Low-confidence issues still alert you — just not auto-fixed.
Real Results
This is not theoretical. Teams using similar pipelines report:
- 30 minutes vs 1 day — Curai Health fixed a complex bug in half an hour that would have taken an engineer a full day to track down and resolve.
- 2 hour debug → one-shot fix — Developers on Twitter reported issues that AI fixed in a single pass, something that would normally require hours of back-and-forth.
- Sprint recovery — Teams that previously lost days to bug triage have recovered entire sprints by automating the obvious fixes.
The pattern is consistent: AI is exceptional at obvious fixes. The kind of issue where you read the stack trace and know the answer immediately. It is not replacing your best engineers — it is keeping them focused on the hard problems where human judgment matters.
Safety Considerations
Automated code changes in production sound scary. Here is how the pipeline stays safe:
Opt-in only. Nothing happens unless you configure it. You choose which Sentry projects connect to the pipeline.
No auto-merge. Every fix creates a PR. You review the diff. You run your tests. You decide when to merge. The pipeline generates code; you own the codebase.
Environment awareness. The pipeline knows the difference between staging and production. Fixes in production go through extra scrutiny — often routing to staging first to verify before anything lands in the main branch.
Confidence thresholds. You set the bar for what gets auto-fixed. Low-confidence issues still alert you; they just do not get automatic PRs.
Human override. At any point, you can disable auto-fixing for specific error types or projects. You are always in control.
When This Works Best
Automated fixing shines on:
- Obvious null checks — The variable that was not defined, the property that does not exist. Read the stack trace, know the fix.
- Type mismatches — Wrong type passed to a function, type coercion that went wrong. Straightforward corrections.
- Boundary conditions — Off-by-one errors, missing validations. Classic bugs with classic fixes.
- Known patterns — Errors that match known anti-patterns where the fix is well-established.
It struggles on:
- Complex distributed issues — Problems that span multiple services and require understanding system-wide state.
- Ambiguous root causes — Errors where the stack trace tells you something broke but not why.
- Security-sensitive changes — Anything related to auth, permissions, or data handling.
The key is starting with your noisiest, simplest errors. The ones that wake you up for issues that take 5 minutes to fix. Let the AI handle those while you sleep.
Setting It Up
Here is what the pipeline includes:
- Webhook server — Deployable to Railway, Vercel, or anywhere that runs Node.js. Receives Sentry webhooks.
- Discovery Agent — Analyzes errors, decides fixability, routes to appropriate handler.
- Planning Agent — Builds execution plans for fixable issues.
- Execution Agents — Generate code changes and tests.
- GitHub integration — Creates PRs with diffs, descriptions, and test results.
- Configuration — Control which errors trigger auto-fix, confidence thresholds, environment rules.
You need:
- A Sentry project with webhook integration enabled
- An OpenClaw instance with coding agent capabilities (Codex or Claude)
- GitHub repository access for PR creation
The skill includes full documentation with step-by-step setup for each component.
The Bottom Line
Every time your best engineer stops what they are doing to fix an obvious bug, you pay three costs:
- The immediate time — 20 minutes to find and fix.
- The recovery time — however long it takes to get back into the flow state they were interrupted from.
- The cumulative fatigue — the slow bleed of energy from constant interruptions.
Sentry Auto-Fix eliminates the first cost entirely, dramatically reduces the second, and over time, almost eliminates the third.
The skill on Claw Mart is $9 and gives you the complete pipeline — webhook receiver, Discovery Agent, Planning Agent, Execution Agents, and GitHub PR integration — ready to configure and deploy. It supports Codex and Claude as backend agents, works with standard GitHub repositories, and includes documentation for setup and customization.
Nine dollars. Less than the coffee your on-call engineer drinks at 2 AM while fixing a null reference.
Next Steps
Here is what to do right now:
- Grab the Sentry Auto-Fix pipeline from Claw Mart.
- Connect it to a single Sentry project — start with your noisiest one, the project that generates the most low-severity issues.
- Configure your webhook in Sentry integration settings to point at your deployed pipeline endpoint.
- Set your agent backend (Codex, Claude, or both) and add your API keys.
- Let it run for a week. Review every PR it creates. Get a feel for the quality, the accuracy, and the types of issues it handles well.
- Expand gradually. Add more projects, tune the Discovery Agent filters, and adjust the confidence thresholds based on what you observe.
The goal is not to eliminate your engineering team involvement in bug fixing. The goal is to eliminate the drudgery — the 2 AM pages for obvious fixes, the sprint-killing bug triage sessions, the context switching that pulls your best people away from meaningful work.
Let the AI handle the grunt work. Keep your humans on the hard problems. That is the whole point.
Recommended for this post

